Rated PG-13, 99 minutes
"Wrath of the Titans" is the mediorcre follow up to the 2010 blockbuster "Clash of The Titans," which somehow was a hit in spite of how bad it was, particularly the cheesy special effects and horrendus 3D. This mildly entertaining but muddled epic (again in needless 3D) is a little better than the first film, which obviously isn't saying much. Most of the cast from the first film is back, including "Avatar's" Sam Worthington, Ralph Fiennes and Liam Neeson as gods battling it out for supremacy, this time in an effort to steal Zeus' power, which we know how that will turn out. An obvious attempt at god-like, gargantuan filmmaking (the explosions come fast and furious) that doesn't make the film any better. Seeing A-listers Fiennes and Neeson go at it, in addition to the fast-paced action sequences and special effects highlight the otherwise pedestrian epic (acting and dialogue are fairly nonexistent), which means it should be a big hit. But it will take all the power of the gods for "Wrath of the Titans" to defeat "The Hunger Games" at the box office this weekend.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Mirror Mirror - B
Rated PG, 106 minutes
"Mirror Mirror" is a darkly comedic, enjoyble take on the "Snow White" fable that should please those familiar with the tale. Julia Roberts is back in great form as the Evil Queen and while this fast-paced, vastly entertaining film is certainly all her film (and she looks smashing in those costumes), young British actress Lily Collins holds her own as the sprightly princess. "Mirror Mirror" is a colorful, enchanting and fun film worth a look for the lavish visuals, costumes and sets along with a great cast, despite its flaws. Snow White is banished to the forest with the dwarfs and must save the land from the Evil Queen, who has her own design and plans, including tyring to marry the charming prince (or is it Prince Charming?), played well by Armie Hammer here. The dark humor will go over the heads of the kids, and not all the comedy works perfectly (including the love potion scene) but it's well-cast (Hammer and Collins make for an engaging pair) and it moves by efficiently. "Mirror Mirror" is also the first "Snow White" adaptation to hit screens this year, followed by the much more dramatic and serious "Snow White and Huntsman" this summer, with Kristen Stewart and Charlize Theron as Snow White and the Evil Queen, respectively. "Mirror Mirror" is a bit of a trifle especially since you know how it all ends, but with all the colorful fun and Roberts back in top form, it's worth seeing.
"Mirror Mirror" is a darkly comedic, enjoyble take on the "Snow White" fable that should please those familiar with the tale. Julia Roberts is back in great form as the Evil Queen and while this fast-paced, vastly entertaining film is certainly all her film (and she looks smashing in those costumes), young British actress Lily Collins holds her own as the sprightly princess. "Mirror Mirror" is a colorful, enchanting and fun film worth a look for the lavish visuals, costumes and sets along with a great cast, despite its flaws. Snow White is banished to the forest with the dwarfs and must save the land from the Evil Queen, who has her own design and plans, including tyring to marry the charming prince (or is it Prince Charming?), played well by Armie Hammer here. The dark humor will go over the heads of the kids, and not all the comedy works perfectly (including the love potion scene) but it's well-cast (Hammer and Collins make for an engaging pair) and it moves by efficiently. "Mirror Mirror" is also the first "Snow White" adaptation to hit screens this year, followed by the much more dramatic and serious "Snow White and Huntsman" this summer, with Kristen Stewart and Charlize Theron as Snow White and the Evil Queen, respectively. "Mirror Mirror" is a bit of a trifle especially since you know how it all ends, but with all the colorful fun and Roberts back in top form, it's worth seeing.
Friday, March 23, 2012
The Hunger Games - B+
Rated R, 142 minutes
“The Hunger Games” is a stirring and entertaining adaptation of Suzanne Collins’ best-selling novel of the same name and an auspicious beginning for the next big tentpole film series. Odds are good that even those unfamiliar with the book series will enjoy it, and those rabid fans will find the film by and large a faithful version of the novel. By now, if you haven’t heard the plot, here is the lowdown. “The Hunger Games” is in the future in what was formerly known as North America now divided into twelve districts. They come together to participate in the Hunger Games, a competition for young boys and girls aged 12-18, in which each contestant battles until one is left. They hold a raffle to determine the contestants, and sixteen-year old Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) volunteers to compete for her sister Prim, whose name is unexpectedly drawn. Now she must rely upon her sharp instincts to compete against highly (and illegally) trained Tributes, who have prepared for these Games their entire lives. Part sci-fi, part action film and part survival film, “The Hunger Games” is a winner: it's entertaining and well-paced, with key plot points and characters retained from the novel; the slower first half gives way to a vastly entertaining, more enjoyable second half. Lawrence grounds the film well in the lead role, while Josh Hutcherson, who looks younger than Lawrence, is also good as Peeta, and the handsome Liam Hemsworth in a smaller part (at least in this part) as Gale. Watch for Stanley Tucci (best of the supporting cast), Wes Bentley, Elizabeth Banks (unrecognizable as Effie), Woody Harrelson (strong as Haymitch), Lenny Kravitz and even veteran actor Donald Sutherland as the insensitive President, all of whom get in good moments. The sets, costumes (the fire amidst the costumes is handled well) and a few action sequences highlight the action-packed film; yet, for what it’s worth “The Hunger Games” is a little long, maybe packing in too much, but that should please fans of the book even more. Whether you’ve read the books or not, odds are in your favor that you will want to see "The Hunger Games," an affecting and enjoyable sci-fi action flick.
“The Hunger Games” is a stirring and entertaining adaptation of Suzanne Collins’ best-selling novel of the same name and an auspicious beginning for the next big tentpole film series. Odds are good that even those unfamiliar with the book series will enjoy it, and those rabid fans will find the film by and large a faithful version of the novel. By now, if you haven’t heard the plot, here is the lowdown. “The Hunger Games” is in the future in what was formerly known as North America now divided into twelve districts. They come together to participate in the Hunger Games, a competition for young boys and girls aged 12-18, in which each contestant battles until one is left. They hold a raffle to determine the contestants, and sixteen-year old Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) volunteers to compete for her sister Prim, whose name is unexpectedly drawn. Now she must rely upon her sharp instincts to compete against highly (and illegally) trained Tributes, who have prepared for these Games their entire lives. Part sci-fi, part action film and part survival film, “The Hunger Games” is a winner: it's entertaining and well-paced, with key plot points and characters retained from the novel; the slower first half gives way to a vastly entertaining, more enjoyable second half. Lawrence grounds the film well in the lead role, while Josh Hutcherson, who looks younger than Lawrence, is also good as Peeta, and the handsome Liam Hemsworth in a smaller part (at least in this part) as Gale. Watch for Stanley Tucci (best of the supporting cast), Wes Bentley, Elizabeth Banks (unrecognizable as Effie), Woody Harrelson (strong as Haymitch), Lenny Kravitz and even veteran actor Donald Sutherland as the insensitive President, all of whom get in good moments. The sets, costumes (the fire amidst the costumes is handled well) and a few action sequences highlight the action-packed film; yet, for what it’s worth “The Hunger Games” is a little long, maybe packing in too much, but that should please fans of the book even more. Whether you’ve read the books or not, odds are in your favor that you will want to see "The Hunger Games," an affecting and enjoyable sci-fi action flick.
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Salmon Fishing in the Yemen - B
Rated PG-13, 112 minutes
Who knew that “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” would be so much fun? The new romantic dramedy with the unusual name somehow interweaves a romance amidst the backdrop of British politics and fly fishing in the Middle East. It helps that the film is helmed by “Chocolat” and “The Cider House Rules” director Lasse Hallstrom and features a strong, talented and eclectic cast that including Ewan McGregor, Emily Blunt and Kristin Scott-Thomas. McGregor is the scientist reluctantly involved in a UK project to bring fishing in the Highlands of Yemen, Blunt is the political expert in charge of bringing the two sides together, while Scott-Thomas is the UK official in charge of getting good publicity from it. Unconventional, charming and often spot-on funny, “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” is a very British-flavored comedy based on the fictional novel by Paul Torday. McGregor and Blunt share nice chemistry, but it’s the witty Scott-Thomas who nearly steals the movie as the caustic UK official who knows everything about everyone; her facial expressions and witty one-liners are chief highlights of the film. Also memorable is Egyptian actor Amr Waked as the Sheikh Muhammed, who'll do nearly anything, including spending millions of his own money, to bring his favorite sport to his country. Waked, normally a serious character actor in such films as “Syriana” and “Contagion,” has a goofy, endearing charm suited for mass appeal. “Salmon Fishing’s” premise is implausible and predictable down the stretch, but the actors and director make it work enough to make you forget that most of the time. Entertaining and charming, “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” is one of the year’s better romantic comedies that both sexes should find appealing.
Who knew that “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” would be so much fun? The new romantic dramedy with the unusual name somehow interweaves a romance amidst the backdrop of British politics and fly fishing in the Middle East. It helps that the film is helmed by “Chocolat” and “The Cider House Rules” director Lasse Hallstrom and features a strong, talented and eclectic cast that including Ewan McGregor, Emily Blunt and Kristin Scott-Thomas. McGregor is the scientist reluctantly involved in a UK project to bring fishing in the Highlands of Yemen, Blunt is the political expert in charge of bringing the two sides together, while Scott-Thomas is the UK official in charge of getting good publicity from it. Unconventional, charming and often spot-on funny, “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” is a very British-flavored comedy based on the fictional novel by Paul Torday. McGregor and Blunt share nice chemistry, but it’s the witty Scott-Thomas who nearly steals the movie as the caustic UK official who knows everything about everyone; her facial expressions and witty one-liners are chief highlights of the film. Also memorable is Egyptian actor Amr Waked as the Sheikh Muhammed, who'll do nearly anything, including spending millions of his own money, to bring his favorite sport to his country. Waked, normally a serious character actor in such films as “Syriana” and “Contagion,” has a goofy, endearing charm suited for mass appeal. “Salmon Fishing’s” premise is implausible and predictable down the stretch, but the actors and director make it work enough to make you forget that most of the time. Entertaining and charming, “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” is one of the year’s better romantic comedies that both sexes should find appealing.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
21 Jump Street - C
Rated R, 109 minutes
The flat, profane and largely unfunny “21 Jump Street” tries to be something new, updating the popular Johnny Depp 1980s drama series of the same name in comedic form. The plot concerns two immature, unskilled new policeman (Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill), who are assigned as uncover high school students to uncover a drug ring. They’re assigned due to their young looks but quickly realize they stick out like a sore thumb. Thin, rambling and badly edited, “21 Jump Street” has a handful of decent comedic moments strung together by some outdated, profane jokes that weren’t funny years ago (how many puberty jokes are there?); it starts out promising then goes downhill quickly. Hill and Tatum don’t have much chemistry (and aren’t that amusing) together, which is surprising given Hill comedic background. Written, co-produced and co-starring Hill, the film is a bit pointless and the characters are unfunny stereotypes, particularly Ice Cube as the Captain who literally (and annoyingly) screams all of his lines. Comedian Rob Riggle comes across best as a befuddled teacher; watch for cameos from original starts Holly Robinson Peete, Peter DeLouise and now superstar Depp himself. Mildly entertaining, “21 Jump Street” isn’t worth going down again.
The flat, profane and largely unfunny “21 Jump Street” tries to be something new, updating the popular Johnny Depp 1980s drama series of the same name in comedic form. The plot concerns two immature, unskilled new policeman (Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill), who are assigned as uncover high school students to uncover a drug ring. They’re assigned due to their young looks but quickly realize they stick out like a sore thumb. Thin, rambling and badly edited, “21 Jump Street” has a handful of decent comedic moments strung together by some outdated, profane jokes that weren’t funny years ago (how many puberty jokes are there?); it starts out promising then goes downhill quickly. Hill and Tatum don’t have much chemistry (and aren’t that amusing) together, which is surprising given Hill comedic background. Written, co-produced and co-starring Hill, the film is a bit pointless and the characters are unfunny stereotypes, particularly Ice Cube as the Captain who literally (and annoyingly) screams all of his lines. Comedian Rob Riggle comes across best as a befuddled teacher; watch for cameos from original starts Holly Robinson Peete, Peter DeLouise and now superstar Depp himself. Mildly entertaining, “21 Jump Street” isn’t worth going down again.
Jeff, Who Lives at Home - B
Rated R, 83 minutes
Unconventional and short but sweet, "Jeff, Who Lives at Home" should really be called "Jeff & Pat" given that it's really more about two brothers, Jeff ("How I Met Your Mother's" Jason Segel) and Pat ("The Office's" Ed Helms) struggling to find their way in life. Jeff is 30 years old, unemployed and lives in the basement of his mother's (Susan Sarandon) house while Pat is struggling with self-fulfillment and his marriage to the lovely Linda (Judy Greer), who may be having an affair. By chance the two meet up and find themselves on a mini-adventure trailing Linda but end up discovering what their real destiny is. "Jeff, Who Lives at Home" is a charming, fun and well-cast journey that tries to be more than what it is: a comedy about finding yourself. Sure, it's nothing new or revelatory, but Segel and Helms, known to many for their small screen roles, make for a wistful, entertaining comedic pair on the large screen too; they treat their characters with a sense of dignity while also having fun (a few amusing moments in a Porsche). It also helps that Mom, who has some self-discovery of her own going on, is played by the lovely Oscar-winner Sarandon. "Jeff" is an enjoyable, likable treat that strives for loftier ideals; when it tries to shift from the goofiness of the moment, it doesn't work as well, but as long as it stays grounded in the moment, it works just fine. "Jeff, Who Lives at Home" is directed and written by Jay and Mark Duplass (the brother team who made "Cyrus"), and is a charming, low-key film that deserves to find a good audience that will appreciate it. Also of note, watch for '80s star Rae Dawn Chong ("Quest for Fire" anyone?) in a strong supporting part as one of Mom's co-workers.
Unconventional and short but sweet, "Jeff, Who Lives at Home" should really be called "Jeff & Pat" given that it's really more about two brothers, Jeff ("How I Met Your Mother's" Jason Segel) and Pat ("The Office's" Ed Helms) struggling to find their way in life. Jeff is 30 years old, unemployed and lives in the basement of his mother's (Susan Sarandon) house while Pat is struggling with self-fulfillment and his marriage to the lovely Linda (Judy Greer), who may be having an affair. By chance the two meet up and find themselves on a mini-adventure trailing Linda but end up discovering what their real destiny is. "Jeff, Who Lives at Home" is a charming, fun and well-cast journey that tries to be more than what it is: a comedy about finding yourself. Sure, it's nothing new or revelatory, but Segel and Helms, known to many for their small screen roles, make for a wistful, entertaining comedic pair on the large screen too; they treat their characters with a sense of dignity while also having fun (a few amusing moments in a Porsche). It also helps that Mom, who has some self-discovery of her own going on, is played by the lovely Oscar-winner Sarandon. "Jeff" is an enjoyable, likable treat that strives for loftier ideals; when it tries to shift from the goofiness of the moment, it doesn't work as well, but as long as it stays grounded in the moment, it works just fine. "Jeff, Who Lives at Home" is directed and written by Jay and Mark Duplass (the brother team who made "Cyrus"), and is a charming, low-key film that deserves to find a good audience that will appreciate it. Also of note, watch for '80s star Rae Dawn Chong ("Quest for Fire" anyone?) in a strong supporting part as one of Mom's co-workers.
Casa de Mi Padre - B
Rated R, 84 minutes
If you like Will Ferrell's English-speaking comedies, you're likely to find his new Spanish-speaking comedy, "Casa de Mi Padre," muy bueno. A spoof of Spanish telenovelas, "Padre" is a risk given Ferrell's limited Spanish, but most of it's spot-on funny if you don't mind laughing and reading subtitles at the same time. Ferrell is a Mexican goofball named Armando Alvarez, a ranch hand on his rich father's big ranch. When the ranch runs runs into some difficulties, his suave but drug-dealing brother (Diego Luna) shows up with his beautiful young fiance (newcomer Genesis Rodriguez), whose family (including Gael Garcia Bernal) provides some challenges for Armando. Goofy and charming, "Casa de Mi Padre" should be a big hit for Ferrell and company, though the comedy may not be for everyone (I know some folks who still hate "Anchorman" to this day). It helps that "Padre" has Ferrell's goofball charm, an easy target in telenovelas (if you compare "Padre" to a real telenovela, there isn't much difference), and one of Ferrell's favorite "Saturday Night Live" writers, Matt Piedmont, directing the film. On the other hand, "Padre" is one big slice of cheesball that some may have difficulty digesting, not to mention that Ferrell's gringo-esque sounding but serviceable Spanish is a slight distraction, but then maybe that's the point. All in all, don't take "Casa de Mi Padre" very seriously and you'll be just fine..and the fake tiger (created by Jim Henson's company) nearly steals the show. Definitely worth it if you like this sort of thing and need a good laugh.
If you like Will Ferrell's English-speaking comedies, you're likely to find his new Spanish-speaking comedy, "Casa de Mi Padre," muy bueno. A spoof of Spanish telenovelas, "Padre" is a risk given Ferrell's limited Spanish, but most of it's spot-on funny if you don't mind laughing and reading subtitles at the same time. Ferrell is a Mexican goofball named Armando Alvarez, a ranch hand on his rich father's big ranch. When the ranch runs runs into some difficulties, his suave but drug-dealing brother (Diego Luna) shows up with his beautiful young fiance (newcomer Genesis Rodriguez), whose family (including Gael Garcia Bernal) provides some challenges for Armando. Goofy and charming, "Casa de Mi Padre" should be a big hit for Ferrell and company, though the comedy may not be for everyone (I know some folks who still hate "Anchorman" to this day). It helps that "Padre" has Ferrell's goofball charm, an easy target in telenovelas (if you compare "Padre" to a real telenovela, there isn't much difference), and one of Ferrell's favorite "Saturday Night Live" writers, Matt Piedmont, directing the film. On the other hand, "Padre" is one big slice of cheesball that some may have difficulty digesting, not to mention that Ferrell's gringo-esque sounding but serviceable Spanish is a slight distraction, but then maybe that's the point. All in all, don't take "Casa de Mi Padre" very seriously and you'll be just fine..and the fake tiger (created by Jim Henson's company) nearly steals the show. Definitely worth it if you like this sort of thing and need a good laugh.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Being Flynn - C
Rated R, 86 minutes
“Being Flynn” is a well-meaning, well-acted but uneven dramedy based on real-events. It stars Paul Dano and Academy Award-winner Robert DeNiro in the lead roles of a young aspiring writer who finally meets up with his estranged, homeless father after years apart. Directed by Paul Weitz (“American Pie” and “In Good Company” among others), it’s based on the experiences of writer Nick Flynn. Downbeat but earthy, the film’s mildly sarcastic tone is a little off-putting, and it’s hard to relate to many of the characters, and it’s largely misdirected by Weitz, better known for more mainstream comedies. DeNiro is the long lost father, and while his performance isn’t anything new or revealing (this could be a revisionist, less violent version of his “Taxi Driver” character), he and Dano share a handful of good scenes together. The underused, underwritten Julianne Moore lovingly appears in flashbacks as Flynn’s mother, and the real Flynn’s girlfriend, the vastly underrated Lili Taylor (always good) plays a co-worker here. “Being Flynn” is a mediocre attempt to show how two people who are related can be markedly different but alike at the same time. Much like an actor miscast in a role, “Being Flynn” shows what happens when the director isn’t well-suited to the material.
We Need to Talk About Kevin - B+
Rated R, 112 minutes
I will say upfront that “We Need to Talk About Kevin” isn’t for everyone. Based on the 2003 novel of the same name, it’s about Eva (Oscar winner Tilda Swinton, excellent), a mother coming to terms with the behavior her teenage son Kevin (Ezra Miller, creepy), who committed some grisly murders at a school. The low-budget “Kevin” focuses on the struggles she and her husband Franklin (John C O’Reilly) had in raising Kevin from the time he was born, and how he ultimately morphed into a murderer. “Kevin’s” strange, dark narrative is not an appealing one, but it’s vividly brought to life in an unconventional but remarkably real performance from Swinton, who was nominated for many awards for the role but somehow overlooked for an Oscar. She’s superb at showing the frailties of parenthood gone wrong from even before she had Kevin, not to mention the unusual ways she’s dealing with being a mother of a murderer; the doting mother she is not. The ending is also a memorable one as mother finally reaches out to son to offer her support, something she should’ve done years ago. “We Need to Talk About Kevin,” directed and written by British director Lynne Ramsay, is adept at showing what happens when the human condition is not nurtured. Worth a look especially for Swinton’s superb performance, which anchors the film nicely.
I will say upfront that “We Need to Talk About Kevin” isn’t for everyone. Based on the 2003 novel of the same name, it’s about Eva (Oscar winner Tilda Swinton, excellent), a mother coming to terms with the behavior her teenage son Kevin (Ezra Miller, creepy), who committed some grisly murders at a school. The low-budget “Kevin” focuses on the struggles she and her husband Franklin (John C O’Reilly) had in raising Kevin from the time he was born, and how he ultimately morphed into a murderer. “Kevin’s” strange, dark narrative is not an appealing one, but it’s vividly brought to life in an unconventional but remarkably real performance from Swinton, who was nominated for many awards for the role but somehow overlooked for an Oscar. She’s superb at showing the frailties of parenthood gone wrong from even before she had Kevin, not to mention the unusual ways she’s dealing with being a mother of a murderer; the doting mother she is not. The ending is also a memorable one as mother finally reaches out to son to offer her support, something she should’ve done years ago. “We Need to Talk About Kevin,” directed and written by British director Lynne Ramsay, is adept at showing what happens when the human condition is not nurtured. Worth a look especially for Swinton’s superb performance, which anchors the film nicely.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Friends with Kids - B
Rated R, 107 minutes
"Friends with Kids" is the new relationship comedy that explores how you can have kids and then fall in love, in that order. Directed, written by and starring Jennifer Westfeldt ("Kissing Jessica Stein"), it's a charming, sweet yet predictable take on testing the usual conventions of child rearing and relationships. Westfeldt is Julie and Adam Scott (from "Parks and Recreation" perfectly cast here) is Jason, the last two of a group of New York friends who haven't married and started a family. Since their other friends (including "Bridesmaids" Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph and Chris O'Dowd, along with Westfeldt's real-life, long-time squeeze, Jon Hamm) are moving forward, Julie and Jason, seemingly platonic BFFs, decide to have and raise a child together but still date other people. But they realize in this unconventional set up there may be deeper feelings that either of them realized. A low-key, heartfelt dramedy, "Friends with Kids" plays a little like a revisionist "Friends" episode, with Westfeldt and Scott inhabiting the Ross-Rachel storyline; you know where it will end up in the end, but there are a handful of charming moments along the way. The biggest weakness with Westfeldt isn't her solid writing or directing, but that she is relatively untested as a lead actress; the wistful Rudolph or Wiig would've been better in the lead role. While she and Scott do exhibit some playful chemistry, Westfeldt lacks a deeper emotional focus to the carry "Friends with Kids" on her back. Overall, "Friends with Kids" is a decent rom com without any hidden messages other than think through having kids with a platonic friend. A solid, above-average effort and mildly entertaining date flick.
"Friends with Kids" is the new relationship comedy that explores how you can have kids and then fall in love, in that order. Directed, written by and starring Jennifer Westfeldt ("Kissing Jessica Stein"), it's a charming, sweet yet predictable take on testing the usual conventions of child rearing and relationships. Westfeldt is Julie and Adam Scott (from "Parks and Recreation" perfectly cast here) is Jason, the last two of a group of New York friends who haven't married and started a family. Since their other friends (including "Bridesmaids" Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph and Chris O'Dowd, along with Westfeldt's real-life, long-time squeeze, Jon Hamm) are moving forward, Julie and Jason, seemingly platonic BFFs, decide to have and raise a child together but still date other people. But they realize in this unconventional set up there may be deeper feelings that either of them realized. A low-key, heartfelt dramedy, "Friends with Kids" plays a little like a revisionist "Friends" episode, with Westfeldt and Scott inhabiting the Ross-Rachel storyline; you know where it will end up in the end, but there are a handful of charming moments along the way. The biggest weakness with Westfeldt isn't her solid writing or directing, but that she is relatively untested as a lead actress; the wistful Rudolph or Wiig would've been better in the lead role. While she and Scott do exhibit some playful chemistry, Westfeldt lacks a deeper emotional focus to the carry "Friends with Kids" on her back. Overall, "Friends with Kids" is a decent rom com without any hidden messages other than think through having kids with a platonic friend. A solid, above-average effort and mildly entertaining date flick.
John Carter - C
Rated PG-13, 132 minutes
“John Carter” is the mysterious new science-fiction action film from Disney and starring a relative unknown. Based on the Edgar Rice Burroughs story “A Princess of Mars” and directed by Andrew Stanton, the director of animated blockbusters “Finding Nemo” and “WALL-E,” “John Carter” is an expensive, modestly entertaining piece of junk. The film is about Confederate captain John Carter (“Friday Night Lights’” Taylor Kitsch), who is mysteriously transported to Mars (known as Barsoom here) where he becomes part of a conflict between various nations of the planets, including Tars Tarkas (Willem Dafoe) and Princess Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collins). Carter then takes it upon himself to save Barsoom and its people. Most of the plot “John Carter” borders on the ridiculous (Burroughs would shudder at this adaptation) and the handsome but bland Kitsch is called upon to carry what could be a tentpole movie on his back, which is the film’s biggest mistake, along with the miscasting of the older Collins as the young princess. Unsurprisingly, given Stanton’s cred as an animated film director, the action sequences and special effects are the highlight and where most of the film’s gigantic $250 million budget went to. “John Carter” isn't an awful film, but for the hefty price tag, the film should’ve been marketed considerably more focusing on its star Kitsch, who will have more opportunities this year to show what he’s worth (“Battleship” anyone?). “John Carter” is an average action film that will have difficulty finding a wide audience…in other words, it’s a disappointment considering all that went into it.
“John Carter” is the mysterious new science-fiction action film from Disney and starring a relative unknown. Based on the Edgar Rice Burroughs story “A Princess of Mars” and directed by Andrew Stanton, the director of animated blockbusters “Finding Nemo” and “WALL-E,” “John Carter” is an expensive, modestly entertaining piece of junk. The film is about Confederate captain John Carter (“Friday Night Lights’” Taylor Kitsch), who is mysteriously transported to Mars (known as Barsoom here) where he becomes part of a conflict between various nations of the planets, including Tars Tarkas (Willem Dafoe) and Princess Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collins). Carter then takes it upon himself to save Barsoom and its people. Most of the plot “John Carter” borders on the ridiculous (Burroughs would shudder at this adaptation) and the handsome but bland Kitsch is called upon to carry what could be a tentpole movie on his back, which is the film’s biggest mistake, along with the miscasting of the older Collins as the young princess. Unsurprisingly, given Stanton’s cred as an animated film director, the action sequences and special effects are the highlight and where most of the film’s gigantic $250 million budget went to. “John Carter” isn't an awful film, but for the hefty price tag, the film should’ve been marketed considerably more focusing on its star Kitsch, who will have more opportunities this year to show what he’s worth (“Battleship” anyone?). “John Carter” is an average action film that will have difficulty finding a wide audience…in other words, it’s a disappointment considering all that went into it.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
A Thousand Words - F
Rated PG-13, 91 minutes
Poor Eddie Murphy. After the release of the comedy "Tower Heist" last fall there was hope that he was returning to his edgier comedic roots. Then things started to fall apart: there was his Oscar host fallout and now the utterly forgettable, genuinely terrible "A Thousand Words," a long-delayed comedy that was originally shot in 2008 and just now getting a wide release. There would be just two words to describe "A Thousand Words" the movie: it stinks. Scoot over "Tower Heist" and welcome back "Meet Dave" and "Norbit." Murphy is a loud-mouth, big-time Hollywood agent named Jack trying to sign a new-age guru to a big contract and he ends up with a tree in his backyard. Except that every time Jack speaks, leaves fall off, signaling the death of the tree and Jack himself and he must discover what to do to save his life from falling apart. Dismally and painfully unfunny, "A Thousand Words," directed by Murphy's "Norbit" and "Meet Dave" director Brian Robbins, it's a truly awful high-concept comedy that will only make you shudder in disbelief. The movie also takes down Allison Janney, Clark Duke (seen to much better effect in "Hot Tub Time Machine"), the lovely Kerry Washington and the always wonderful Ruby Dee, who should've slapped some sense into Eddie for making this piece of Razzie-award inducing dreck. Annoying and predictable until the end, when it becomes some maudlin clap trap about forgiveness and doing the right thing. Do the right thing and avoid "A Thousand Words" at all costs.
Poor Eddie Murphy. After the release of the comedy "Tower Heist" last fall there was hope that he was returning to his edgier comedic roots. Then things started to fall apart: there was his Oscar host fallout and now the utterly forgettable, genuinely terrible "A Thousand Words," a long-delayed comedy that was originally shot in 2008 and just now getting a wide release. There would be just two words to describe "A Thousand Words" the movie: it stinks. Scoot over "Tower Heist" and welcome back "Meet Dave" and "Norbit." Murphy is a loud-mouth, big-time Hollywood agent named Jack trying to sign a new-age guru to a big contract and he ends up with a tree in his backyard. Except that every time Jack speaks, leaves fall off, signaling the death of the tree and Jack himself and he must discover what to do to save his life from falling apart. Dismally and painfully unfunny, "A Thousand Words," directed by Murphy's "Norbit" and "Meet Dave" director Brian Robbins, it's a truly awful high-concept comedy that will only make you shudder in disbelief. The movie also takes down Allison Janney, Clark Duke (seen to much better effect in "Hot Tub Time Machine"), the lovely Kerry Washington and the always wonderful Ruby Dee, who should've slapped some sense into Eddie for making this piece of Razzie-award inducing dreck. Annoying and predictable until the end, when it becomes some maudlin clap trap about forgiveness and doing the right thing. Do the right thing and avoid "A Thousand Words" at all costs.
Silent House - B
Rated R, 88 minutes
Houses hold many secrets, and the spooky house in the stylish, tense new psychological horror film "Silent House," starring Elizabeth Olsen is no different. Sarah (Olsen, Ashley and Mary Kate's younger sister and a fine actress) is a young woman who finds herself sealed inside her family's secluded lake house. With no contact to the outside world, and no way out, panic turns to terror as events become increasingly ominous in and around the house. "Silent House" is a terrific low-budget horror film that's actually a remake of a 2010 Uruguayan super-low budget horror film "The Silent House." Like that film, this version unravels the chills in one, long extended real-time take, an unconventional feat that works in the film's favor most of the time. The first hour or so is a sharp, well-crafted piece with enough chills to keep you firmly glued to your seat; the stringy music and moody photography from co-directors Chris Kentis and Laura Lau perfectly draws you into the creepy house. However, the real revelation of "Silent House" isn't its technical marvels, but the terrific performance from Olsen, who expertly carries the film in a creepy one-woman show; she had a breakout performance last year in another low-budget independent film, "Martha Marcy Mae Marlene" and should gain more attention as the girl who finds the villain much closer than she thinks. As "Silent House's" secrets unravel, you have a sense of where it will end up, and may leave some a shade unsatisfied. But it's scary fun getting there, and Olsen will have you watching every step of the way. Definitely worth checking out, "Silent House" will have you anything but silent after it's over.
Friday, March 2, 2012
Tyler Perry's Good Deeds - C
Rated PG-13, 111 minutes
"Good Deeds" is the latest Tyler Perry effort about a rich man who is jolted out of his predictable routing and into the real world. Written and directed by and starring Perry as the title character, "Good Deeds" finds itself in the same territory as most of Perry's other films about people struggling to do the right thing. Here Perry is Wesley Deeds, a CEO of a company who begins an unlikely friendship with one of his employees, Lindsey (the lovely Thandie Newton), a down-on-her-luck single mother with an array of problems. Wesley has his own problems, such as a stale relationship with his fiancee (Gabrielle Union) or a fractured one with his family (Phylicia Rashad, Brian J. White). When you're as successful a filmmaker as Perry who knows his audience, you can do almost anything you want, which Perry generally does (including not screening the film for critics, a smart move on his part), and the mediocre "Good Deeds," while better acted and directed than some of his previous films, still struggles with cookie-cutter characters and second-rate, predictable storytelling. There are a handful of affecting scenes and the beautiful Newton is the best thing about it, probably too good for "Good Deeds." It's also hard to believe that Newton and Jamie Kennedy, along with Eddie Cibiran and Rebecca Romjin, are all in the same film, if that tells you anything about its quality. "Good Deeds," while a notch better than what Perry has done in the past, is much like what he has done in the past - and give him credit here where much of Hollywood fails at this - is filled with decent, honorable messages about doing the right thing, but unfortunately not much of it is memorable. "Good Deeds" isn't terrible, but not that great either.
"Good Deeds" is the latest Tyler Perry effort about a rich man who is jolted out of his predictable routing and into the real world. Written and directed by and starring Perry as the title character, "Good Deeds" finds itself in the same territory as most of Perry's other films about people struggling to do the right thing. Here Perry is Wesley Deeds, a CEO of a company who begins an unlikely friendship with one of his employees, Lindsey (the lovely Thandie Newton), a down-on-her-luck single mother with an array of problems. Wesley has his own problems, such as a stale relationship with his fiancee (Gabrielle Union) or a fractured one with his family (Phylicia Rashad, Brian J. White). When you're as successful a filmmaker as Perry who knows his audience, you can do almost anything you want, which Perry generally does (including not screening the film for critics, a smart move on his part), and the mediocre "Good Deeds," while better acted and directed than some of his previous films, still struggles with cookie-cutter characters and second-rate, predictable storytelling. There are a handful of affecting scenes and the beautiful Newton is the best thing about it, probably too good for "Good Deeds." It's also hard to believe that Newton and Jamie Kennedy, along with Eddie Cibiran and Rebecca Romjin, are all in the same film, if that tells you anything about its quality. "Good Deeds," while a notch better than what Perry has done in the past, is much like what he has done in the past - and give him credit here where much of Hollywood fails at this - is filled with decent, honorable messages about doing the right thing, but unfortunately not much of it is memorable. "Good Deeds" isn't terrible, but not that great either.
Project X- D-
Rated R, 87 minutes
"Project X" is the latest documentary-style, low-budget, cinema verite that takes advantage of shaky hand-held lost-footage style movies becoming increasingly cheap and popular to make. That doesn't mean that any of it's original, funny or good in any way, but "Project X" will have appeal to mostly young males who enjoy seeing this type of low-brow, T&A, drink-as-much-as-you-can party style debauchery (the young guys in the theater I saw it at were roaring if that tells you anything). Todd Phillips, the guy behind similar-themed filmed films such as "Old School" and "The Hangover," uses a largely unknown cast found though mostly open casting calls, which would supposedly help the film keep its budget pretty low, that and the fact no decent actor in Hollywood would likely want to be in it. "Project X," the film's name because the producers wanted to keep it secret (probably because it is so bad), is essentially one long all-night naked drinking pool party told via a handheld, ultra shaky camera. Annoying, painfully unfunny and ultimately needless, it's far from revealing (except for the pretty young girls who go topless through most of it) and most just a stupid excuse to drink beer and take off your clothes. On that note, it will likely be a huge hit and spawn more films like it. You've been warned. You know what you're in for. So stay as far away from "Project X" as possible and use your time much better.
"Project X" is the latest documentary-style, low-budget, cinema verite that takes advantage of shaky hand-held lost-footage style movies becoming increasingly cheap and popular to make. That doesn't mean that any of it's original, funny or good in any way, but "Project X" will have appeal to mostly young males who enjoy seeing this type of low-brow, T&A, drink-as-much-as-you-can party style debauchery (the young guys in the theater I saw it at were roaring if that tells you anything). Todd Phillips, the guy behind similar-themed filmed films such as "Old School" and "The Hangover," uses a largely unknown cast found though mostly open casting calls, which would supposedly help the film keep its budget pretty low, that and the fact no decent actor in Hollywood would likely want to be in it. "Project X," the film's name because the producers wanted to keep it secret (probably because it is so bad), is essentially one long all-night naked drinking pool party told via a handheld, ultra shaky camera. Annoying, painfully unfunny and ultimately needless, it's far from revealing (except for the pretty young girls who go topless through most of it) and most just a stupid excuse to drink beer and take off your clothes. On that note, it will likely be a huge hit and spawn more films like it. You've been warned. You know what you're in for. So stay as far away from "Project X" as possible and use your time much better.
Dr. Seuss' The Lorax - C+
Rated PG, 86 minutes
If you want a "green" cartoon, then "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax" might just be for you. Bright yet forgettable, the problem with "The Lorax" isn't the message but the weak, updated story that, well, waters down the original 1971 Dr. Seuss book. A boy named Ted (Zac Efron) searches for the one thing - a unique tree - that will enable him to win the affection of Audrey (Taylor Swift), the girl of his dreams. To find it he must discover the story of the Lorax (Danny DeVito), the grumpy yet charming creature who fights to protect his world against the Once-Ler (Ed Helms) and Mr. O'Hare (Rob Riggle), who feel threatened by the beauty of nature. Dr. Seuss himself might find issue with the fact that Hollywood has given his intelligent book about environmentalism a big-budgeted, dumbed-down take, but even tree huggers won't argue with the fact The Lorax, both the character and the film, are so darned charming it makes it difficult to be critical. "The Lorax" will appeal mostly to young kids, who likely won't care or notice the film's thin pro-environmental messages. On that note, "The Lorax" is safe, fun and appealing. Otherwise it's mostly everything Dr. Suess' didn't espouse: formulaic, cookie-cutter and mostly forgettable story and characters.
If you want a "green" cartoon, then "Dr. Seuss' The Lorax" might just be for you. Bright yet forgettable, the problem with "The Lorax" isn't the message but the weak, updated story that, well, waters down the original 1971 Dr. Seuss book. A boy named Ted (Zac Efron) searches for the one thing - a unique tree - that will enable him to win the affection of Audrey (Taylor Swift), the girl of his dreams. To find it he must discover the story of the Lorax (Danny DeVito), the grumpy yet charming creature who fights to protect his world against the Once-Ler (Ed Helms) and Mr. O'Hare (Rob Riggle), who feel threatened by the beauty of nature. Dr. Seuss himself might find issue with the fact that Hollywood has given his intelligent book about environmentalism a big-budgeted, dumbed-down take, but even tree huggers won't argue with the fact The Lorax, both the character and the film, are so darned charming it makes it difficult to be critical. "The Lorax" will appeal mostly to young kids, who likely won't care or notice the film's thin pro-environmental messages. On that note, "The Lorax" is safe, fun and appealing. Otherwise it's mostly everything Dr. Suess' didn't espouse: formulaic, cookie-cutter and mostly forgettable story and characters.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Coriolanus - B+
Rated R, 122 minutes
"Coriolanus" is the new military film directed by and starring Ralph Fiennes, though the source material is hardly new. It's based on the tragic Shakespeare play of the same name and while updated with contemporary references, it's still spoken in the King's English. Well-acted, sublimely directed by Fiennes and often mesmerizing, "Coriolanus" is a worthy, cerebral effort geared mostly for art-house audiences up for something like this. Caius Martius "Coriolanus (Fiennes) is a revered and feared Roman General at odds with the city of Rome and its citizens. Pushed by his controlling mother Volumnia (Vanessa Redgrave, in a stunning, memorable performance) to seek a higher postion, Coriolanus must engage himself with the masses to secure votes for office, something he loathes doing. When the public refuses to support Coriolanus, he's banished from the city and allies himself with a powerful enemy (Gerard Butler, scowling) that has tragic results for him and his family. "Coriolanus" is an auspicious directorial feature film debut for British actor Fiennes, best known to the masses as Voldemort in the "Harry Potter" series. The plot is thick and you must listen closely to the age-old dialogue, but overall it's a satisfying, if not, downbeat, effort, especially if you're familiar with Shakespeare's tragedies. Brian Cox and the ubiquitous, recently Oscar-nominated Jessica Chastain round out the great cast.
"Coriolanus" is the new military film directed by and starring Ralph Fiennes, though the source material is hardly new. It's based on the tragic Shakespeare play of the same name and while updated with contemporary references, it's still spoken in the King's English. Well-acted, sublimely directed by Fiennes and often mesmerizing, "Coriolanus" is a worthy, cerebral effort geared mostly for art-house audiences up for something like this. Caius Martius "Coriolanus (Fiennes) is a revered and feared Roman General at odds with the city of Rome and its citizens. Pushed by his controlling mother Volumnia (Vanessa Redgrave, in a stunning, memorable performance) to seek a higher postion, Coriolanus must engage himself with the masses to secure votes for office, something he loathes doing. When the public refuses to support Coriolanus, he's banished from the city and allies himself with a powerful enemy (Gerard Butler, scowling) that has tragic results for him and his family. "Coriolanus" is an auspicious directorial feature film debut for British actor Fiennes, best known to the masses as Voldemort in the "Harry Potter" series. The plot is thick and you must listen closely to the age-old dialogue, but overall it's a satisfying, if not, downbeat, effort, especially if you're familiar with Shakespeare's tragedies. Brian Cox and the ubiquitous, recently Oscar-nominated Jessica Chastain round out the great cast.
Undefeated - B+
Rated PG-13, 110 minutes
Uplifting and intelligent, the new documentary "Undefeated" is an inspiring look at a Tennessee high school football coach and his efforts to turn his team into winners on and off the field. In a real-life turn of events, the film itself was an underdog as it surprisingly won the Academy Award for Documentary Feature. It's worth a look for those who enjoy an entertaining, inspiring real underdog sports story, though the football aspect is really just the backdrop for the human story of the coach and players. "Undefeated" chronicles the story of the Manassas Tigers 2009 season in Manassas, Tennessee. They strive to win the school's first playoff game in the high school's 110-year history. Their coach is Bill Courtney, who's been coaching the team since 2004 and also owns a lumber business in addition to coaching. The players all come from underprivileged and mostly rough backgrounds but they're the most talented team from Manassas to take the field, and the documentary intimately tells all their stories in their attempts to make history. "Undefeated" isn't anything revelatory except that the stories, characters and their challenges are very real. It's also a touching, unforgettable story you won't want to miss. The moving, emotional story will require plenty of tissues, so don't forget them if you see "Undefeated." Inspiring, powerful and intelligently made, you will understand why it recently won the Oscar for Documentary Feature.
Uplifting and intelligent, the new documentary "Undefeated" is an inspiring look at a Tennessee high school football coach and his efforts to turn his team into winners on and off the field. In a real-life turn of events, the film itself was an underdog as it surprisingly won the Academy Award for Documentary Feature. It's worth a look for those who enjoy an entertaining, inspiring real underdog sports story, though the football aspect is really just the backdrop for the human story of the coach and players. "Undefeated" chronicles the story of the Manassas Tigers 2009 season in Manassas, Tennessee. They strive to win the school's first playoff game in the high school's 110-year history. Their coach is Bill Courtney, who's been coaching the team since 2004 and also owns a lumber business in addition to coaching. The players all come from underprivileged and mostly rough backgrounds but they're the most talented team from Manassas to take the field, and the documentary intimately tells all their stories in their attempts to make history. "Undefeated" isn't anything revelatory except that the stories, characters and their challenges are very real. It's also a touching, unforgettable story you won't want to miss. The moving, emotional story will require plenty of tissues, so don't forget them if you see "Undefeated." Inspiring, powerful and intelligently made, you will understand why it recently won the Oscar for Documentary Feature.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)